Arizona
California
Florida
Louisiana
Michigan
Mississippi
Oklahoma
Oregon
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Wisconsin
|
|
|
Arizona

Clown Racing

Dirt Fiend Racing

Kenz Cycle Tech

Triple X Seats
California

Shearer Pipes

Schack 'High Quality Kill Switches'

Slip Shot Racing
Florida
Kansas

Fast Fibers
Louisiana

Ricks Tinker Shop
Michigan

A&S Racing

Chariot Performance
Mississippi

Deaf Man Chassis
Missouri
Ohio

AM Custom Chassis

Turbo Chassis
Oklahoma

Noss Machine
Oregon

Northwest Sleeve
Tennessee

Race Reflections
Texas
Virginia

Lewis Racing
|
|
|
#1038879 - 04/26/10 04:52 PM
Re: Shifter/Snomo/Spreadbore/"stock" Spread Seperation
[Re: Calvin Pollet]
|
Cool Sum Bitch
 
Registered: 01/23/04
Posts: 5082
Loc: Stafford, VA
|
when someone walked into the pit I was in and proceeded to tell me why I was wrong to believe the way I do. This was my first experience with this PS member........and I now feel he is an even bigger pain in the rear than I did before I met him.....BUT THAT IS RACIN.....and everyone is entitled to their own opinion! This part of your post is even funnier than watching you waddle off, muttering under your breath, looking for somewhere to spew your bias without challenge.  It was me that walked into the staging area but I didn't say a word until YOU said that you don't like snomos. I didn't know you from Adam but when I heard those words come out of your mouth, I had a pretty good idea who was talking. After listening to you bitch about the 4 strokes (still) and then hearing you talk down about snomos, I laughed at your biased comment, introduced myself, and gave MY opinion on why some people want to keep the classes separated. I never told you what you should think, I only gave my opinion on why I believe some don't want huge classes. Instead of discussing this (and PSDRA I hoped) like rational adults with different opinions, you ran away. And you thinking that I'm a pain in the rear doesn't affect me in the slightest, I'd MUCH rather be known as a pain in the rear than someone who acts differently on the internet than in person or someone who openly dislikes others' choice of race machine.  What that person did say that needs to be addressed here is that the shifter bike owners do not want to run against the snomo bikes........NOTHING could be farther from the truth, the shifter bikes that are limited to "non-spreadbore" don't want to run against ANY engine with a spreadbore.....shifter OR snomo. Why are you the only one that can interpret "the truth"? If your interpretation is accurate, CVTs would be allowed in any of the 102c2c classes but so far, nobody has offered that up as a potential solution. Some say they want to keep the classes separate because of the spreadbore shifter's "potential" but until 102c2c shifters and spreadbore CVTs can run in the same CC classes, I stand by my opinion, smaller classes make shifter reliability less of a factor. 
_________________________
UBETRUN Racing"In theory, practice and theory are the same but in practice, they are different."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1038916 - 04/26/10 06:18 PM
Re: Shifter/Snomo/Spreadbore/"stock" Spread Seperation
[Re: ubetrun]
|
Site Sponsor
Cool Sum Bitch
 
Registered: 11/07/02
Posts: 2946
Loc: Oklahoma
|
It was me that walked into the staging area but I didn't say a word until YOU said that you don't like snomos.
I didn't mention who it was that I spoke with.....but since you did........You can't even get the facts straight about where the conversation took place, why should I expect you to get ANYTHING else understood that I said. I was standing in the pits at a trailer talking to the owner of the bike which was also sitting beside his trailer.......as for your opinion, "IF" I ever want to hear your opinion, I will ask for it or at least listen to it, "if" it is given during a conversation we are having....which I would just as soon never have with you again. It was not until our conversation was over that I was informed who you were, you did introduce yourself by name, but the name didn't ring any bells to me.....UNTIL I was asked if I saw the "ubetrun" racing shirt, THEN the attitude and demeanor made perfect sense, you are exactly the same in front of the computer as you are in person......wrong, and mad about it. I was in the Askin Motorsports(?) pit speaking with a real nice guy named Patrick, (at least I believe that is his name), about an engine with cylinders we make.....I was in a golf cart, which left the pit after you did, so as for the "woddling off" remark it must have been at a different time you were watchin this slightly overweight guy walk away, (something I am pretty darn uncomfortable with by the way....but that may also say quite a bit about you....IDK) ...If your interpretation is accurate, CVTs would be allowed in any of the 102c2c classes but so far, nobody has offered that up as a potential solution.... THAT IS exactly my interpretation, do away with the 102c2c separator, and I have "offered it up" MANY times. IMO, the only separators for classes should be the number of cylinders, and the displacement. I know the four-strokes feel they need the displacement handicap, and I really can't argue there may need to be "some" handicap given in displacement between 2-strokes and 4-strokes, but if the displacement breaks are put in the right place, IMO, the separation based on c2c width would be unnecessary.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1038941 - 04/26/10 07:32 PM
Re: Shifter/Snomo/Spreadbore/"stock" Spread Seperation
[Re: Calvin Pollet]
|
Cool Sum Bitch
 
Registered: 01/23/04
Posts: 5082
Loc: Stafford, VA
|
It was me that walked into the staging area but I didn't say a word until YOU said that you don't like snomos.
I didn't mention who it was that I spoke with.....but since you did........You can't even get the facts straight about where the conversation took place, why should I expect you to get ANYTHING else understood that I said. I was standing in the pits at a trailer talking to the owner of the bike which was also sitting beside his trailer....... Maybe I am wrong about the location, I thought (think) it was by the staging lanes where they were weighing bikes. Even if the location is wrong, that doesn't negate the sequence of the conversation which you haven't actually denied. YOU first mentioned your dislike of snomos to two snomo racers before I said a single word. as for your opinion, "IF" I ever want to hear your opinion, I will ask for it or at least listen to it, "if" it is given during a conversation we are having....which I would just as soon never have with you again. It was not until our conversation was over that I was informed who you were, you did introduce yourself by name, but the name didn't ring any bells to me.....UNTIL I was asked if I saw the "ubetrun" racing shirt, THEN the attitude and demeanor made perfect sense If you think I need your permission to offer my opinion, you are sadly mistaken. You didn't ask my opinion before telling anyone within earshot (me) that you didn't like snomos and other than laughing at your biased comment, I don't think I displayed any particular attitude or demeanor.  you are exactly the same in front of the computer as you are in person......wrong, and mad about it. Having a different opinion doesn't make me wrong and I assure you that I'm not mad but I agree that I am the same in front of the computer as I am in person...unlike you who left in a little huff but now has plenty to say.  I was in the Askin Motorsports(?) pit speaking with a real nice guy named Patrick, (at least I believe that is his name), about an engine with cylinders we make.....I was in a golf cart, which left the pit after you did, so as for the "woddling off" remark it must have been at a different time you were watchin this slightly overweight guy walk away, (something I am pretty darn uncomfortable with by the way....but that may also say quite a bit about you....IDK) I may be wrong about the location but I'm damned sure not wrong about you "having to leave after that comment". Don't know or care where you went after or how you got there but you damn sure left in a hurry.  ...If your interpretation is accurate, CVTs would be allowed in any of the 102c2c classes but so far, nobody has offered that up as a potential solution.... THAT IS exactly my interpretation, do away with the 102c2c separator, and I have "offered it up" MANY times. IMO, the only separators for classes should be the number of cylinders, and the displacement. I know the four-strokes feel they need the displacement handicap, and I really can't argue there may need to be "some" handicap given in displacement between 2-strokes and 4-strokes, but if the displacement breaks are put in the right place, IMO, the separation based on c2c width would be unnecessary. When I said that nobody has offered it up, I meant no racers have offered it up. I wasn't talking about those that don't actually race but try tell others how they should do it...
_________________________
UBETRUN Racing"In theory, practice and theory are the same but in practice, they are different."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
Registered: 12/17/08
Posts: 49
|
|
|